A store is negligent in not providing sufficient lighting in its parking lot. One night a woman is robbed by an unknown assailant. She wants to sue the store. If she loses her case, it will most likely be because.

A store is negligent in not providing sufficient lighting in its parking lot. One night a woman is robbed by an unknown assailant. She wants to sue the store. If she loses her case, it will most likely be because.

A store is negligent in not providing sufficient lighting in its parking lot. One night a woman is robbed by an unknown assailant. She wants to sue the store. If she loses her case, it will most likely be because.


Answer:


  1. The court found the store did not owe her a duty of care. 
  2. The court found that there was no proximate cause between the actions of the store and her injury.
  3. The court found that her injury was not foreseeable.