In the article "Wired for Categorization", what did the authors come to conclude?

In the article "Wired for Categorization", what did the authors come to conclude?





A)
Various sensory input and experience forms the basis of differential animate and inanimate object processing.
B)
There is an innate basis for the development of differential processing areas for threatening and non-threatening stimuli.
C)
Unlike previous beliefs claimed, two separate processing areas for animate and inanimate objects do not actually exist.
D)
Proper early visual input is not enough to be able to explain differential processing of animate and inanimate objects.



Answer: D