Nagel and Fields entered into a contract in which Nagel was obligated to deliver certain goods to Fields by September 10. On September 3, Nagel told Fields that Nagel had no intention of delivering the goods required by the contract. Prior to September 10, Fields may successfully sue ?Nagel under the doctrine of

Nagel and Fields entered into a contract in which Nagel was obligated to deliver certain goods to Fields by September 10. On September 3, Nagel told Fields that Nagel had no intention of delivering the goods required by the contract. Prior to September 10, Fields may successfully sue ?Nagel under the doctrine of






a. Promissory estoppel.
b. Accord and satisfaction.
c. Anticipatory repudiation.
d. Substantial performance.





Answer: C


Tax

Learn More Multiple Choice Question :