Skylar, CPA, purchased from Wiz Corp. two computers. Skylar discovered material defects in the computers ten months after taking delivery. Three years after discovering the defects, Skylar commenced an action for breach of warranty against Wiz. Wiz has raised the statute of limitations as a defense. The original contract between Wiz and Skylar contained a conspicuous clause providing that the statute of limitations for breach of warranty actions would be limited to eighteen months. Under the circumstances, Skylar will

Skylar, CPA, purchased from Wiz Corp. two computers. Skylar discovered material defects in the computers ten months after taking delivery. Three years after discovering the defects, Skylar commenced an action for breach of warranty against Wiz. Wiz has raised the statute of limitations as a defense. The original contract between Wiz and Skylar contained a conspicuous clause providing that the statute of limitations for breach of warranty actions would be limited to eighteen months. Under the circumstances, Skylar will






a. Win because the action was commenced within the Four-year period as measured form the date of delivery.
b. Win because the action was commenced within the four-year period as measured from the time he discovered the breach or should have discovered the breach.
c. Lose because the clause providing that the statute of limitation would be limited to eighteen months is enforceable.
d. Lose because the statute of limitations is three years from the date of delivery with respect to written contract.






Answer: C


Tax

Learn More Multiple Choice Question :