Jack and Jill were discussing business over lunch when they agreed on the sale of some goods. Because neither of them had any paper handy, Jack wrote the following on a napkin: "Jill agrees to purchase from Jack, 1,000 widgets to be delivered on July 1, 2011, at a cost of $10,000, payable on delivery." Jill and Jack both signed the napkin. Jack delivered the widgets per the contract, but Jill refuses to pay for them. If Jack sues Jill for the price of the goods, the most likely result is which of the following?

Jack and Jill were discussing business over lunch when they agreed on the sale of some goods. Because neither of them had any paper handy, Jack wrote the following on a napkin: "Jill agrees to purchase from Jack, 1,000 widgets to be delivered on July 1, 2011, at a cost of $10,000, payable on delivery." Jill and Jack both signed the napkin. Jack delivered the widgets per the contract, but Jill refuses to pay for them. If Jack sues Jill for the price of the goods, the most likely result is which of the following?

Jack and Jill were discussing business over lunch when they agreed on the sale of some goods. Because neither of them had any paper handy, Jack wrote the following on a napkin: "Jill agrees to purchase from Jack, 1,000 widgets to be delivered on July 1, 2011, at a cost of $10,000, payable on delivery." Jill and Jack both signed the napkin. Jack delivered the widgets per the contract, but Jill refuses to pay for them. If Jack sues Jill for the price of the goods, the most likely result is which of the following?




a. Jill will win because this writing is not sufficient under the Statute of Frauds.
b. Jack will win because the writing is sufficient under the Statute of Frauds.
c. Jill will win because this is a formal contract.
d. Jack will win because the Statute of Frauds does not apply to this situation.







Answer: B